|
|
EXTRA! EXTRA! |
|
|
|
||
|
Newbery Award Scandal!!
|
||
|
By Michele Farley and Lisa Habegger |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The American Library Association has recently
discovered that two of its Newbery Award Committee members were paid for their
votes over the last three years. A letter was mailed to this paper
anonymously stating that a publisher had given committee members money and
other gifts to choose their books for the award. The Newbery Award is the
top award for children's books in
|
|
|
|
Your job is to review the winning Newbery books from the last three years to determine if they truly are award winning books. The books are A Year Down Yonder by Richard Peck, Bud, Not Buddy by Christopher Paul Curtis and Holes by Louis Sachar. You have already read all three books in class. You will be responsible for looking at the books from the areas of theme, presentation, plot development, character development, setting and style. Your final report will help the full committee decide if the book really is a winner. You will be split up into groups of three and each of you will have a specific role in looking at the books. The Artistic Designer will be looking at the style the book is written in and the presentation of each book. The Developer will be researching the development of the plot and the characters. The Background Coordinator will study the setting and theme of each book. After researching your specific topic, your group will present your results to the class (complete Newbery Committee) in the form of a PowerPoint slide show.
|
|
|
|
Artistic Designer:
You will be learning about writing styles, accuracy in writing and organization. Here are some questions that you should consider while reviewing your books:
Developer:
Your assignment is to look at the development of the characters and the plot. Think about the following questions while you are going through the books:
Background Coordinator:
Your job will be to take a closer look at the settings and themes of each book. Here are some things to consider:
Your group should not limit themselves to answering these questions for their summary. You will find more information on each of the books, authors and the Newbery Award process in the resources section. Once you have gathered all of your information, you will each be responsible for a one page essay stating your findings. You must use at least two of these sources in your research.
Once you have reviewed each of your books and answered the questions posed, you will start to work on your final report for the committee. Each person in the group will be responsible for a one page summary of their findings that will be turned in to the committee chairman (your teacher). Then, the entire group will make a PowerPoint slide show combining their efforts to convince the full committee (the class) that the book should remain an award winner or not.
|
|
|
|
There are several other ways to gather information for your presentations beyond just answering the questions that are provided. Here are some other people and places that will help you in your search for information.
http://teacher.scholastic.com/writewit/bookrev/index.htm
http://home.earthlink.net/~jesmith/Writing-critique.html
http://www.ala.org/alsc/nmedal.html
Your teacher.
The Media Specialist.
Your classmates.
|
|
|
|
Your grade will be based on the two parts of the assignment. The summary that you turn in will be worth a total of 50 points and the PowerPoint Presentation will be worth 50 points as well. The total for the assignment will be 100 points. Below are the criteria for earning those points.
Summary
Evaluation
|
|
0 Poor |
5 Average |
10 Above Average |
Score |
|
Grammar and Spelling |
Five or more misspellings or errors in your grammar. |
Less than five errors in spelling and grammar. |
No errors in spelling or grammar |
|
|
Organization |
Paragraphs are not organized so that the essay flows. Summary is confusing and unclear. |
There are some places where the reader gets lost or confused, but overall, the summary is clear. |
Summary is organized logically and the paragraphs are seamless. |
|
|
Paragraphs |
The paragraphs do not have a beginning or concluding sentence and are 2 sentences or less. |
Paragraphs do not have 5 sentences and/or the beginning or conclusions are not well stated. |
Each paragraph has a clear beginning and conclusion and contains at least 5 sentences. |
|
|
Neatness |
Handwriting is hard to read. |
Handwriting is readable, but could be neater. |
Handwriting is neat and legible. |
|
|
Works Cited Page |
Five or more mistakes on the page. |
Less than five mistakes on the page. |
All works cited are correct. |
|
PowerPoint
Evaluation
|
|
0 Poor |
5 Average |
10 Above Average |
|
|
Number of Slides |
Less than four slides included in presentation. |
Less than seven, but more than four slides in presentations. |
Seven or more slides included in presentation. |
|
|
Grammar and Punctuation |
Five or more mistakes in grammar and punctuation. |
Less than five errors in grammar and punctuation. |
No errors in grammar and punctuation. |
|
|
Appearance |
Slides have little or no color. Text is difficult to read and there are no graphics or graphics are distracting. |
Slides have some color. Graphics could be better chosen and text could be clearer. |
Text is easy to read and slides are appealing to the eye. |
|
|
Organization |
The presentation is very confusing and the slides are not in any particular order. |
The viewer is confused in some places, but the idea of the presentation is still clear. |
Slides are in logical order and the material on each slide is seamless. |
|
|
Presentation |
Only one group member speaks during presentation. |
Only two group members speak during presentation |
All group members participate in presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
After having read and reviewed the three books, you and your team should have decided whether or not you believe that these books truly are award winners. You should have also learned more about looking at books from a critical point of view. Examining the books by looking at the different aspects should have given you a better perspective on the book as a whole. Did you agree with the Newbery Committee or do you think they made a mistake?
Last updated March 2005 by Trisha Armstrong